Topics

• 1st Amendment
• Affirmative Defenses
• Appeals
• Arbitration
• Attorney's Fees
• CELA - Amicus Curiae
• CELA - Internal Business
• CELA - Meetings & Announcements
• CELA - Minutes
• CHRO & EEOC
• Class & Collective Actions
• Contracts
• Damages
• Defamation
• Discovery
• Discrimination
• Discrimination - Age
• Discrimination - Disability
• Discrimination - Ethnicity & National Origin
• Discrimination - Gender
• Discrimination - General
• Discrimination - Other
• Discrimination - Pregnancy
• Discrimination - Race & Color
• Discrimination - Religion
• Discrimination - Sexual Orientation
• Disparate Impact
• Dispositive Motions
• ERISA & Employee Benefits
• Emotional Distress
• Equal Pay
• Ethics
• Evidence
• Experts
• FMLA & Leaves of Absence
• Federal Employees
• Feedback on Adversaries, Neutrals & Factfinders
• Hostile Work Environment
• Jury Instructions
• Labor Law
• Legislation - Connecticut
• Legislation - Federal
• Mediation
• Member Victories
• NELA - News & Announcements
• Nela - Events & Conferences
• Noncompete Clauses
• Other
• Practice & Procedure - Connecticut
• Practice & Procedure - Federal
• Privacy
• Promissory Estoppel
• Public Employees
• Referrals
• Retaliation
• Settlement Agreements
• Severance
• Sexual & Other Harassment
• Summary Judgment
• Torts
• Trial
• USERRA
• Unemployment Compensation
• Unions & Collective Bargaining
• Wage & Hour
• Whistleblower Law
• Workers' Compensation
• Wrongful Termination
• Z-Help
• Z-Off Topic

Discrimination - Other

Questions and Answers (5)

• Are there any Connecticut cases that recognize a common-law cause of action for violation of a public policy in a case involving hiring rather than discharge? In other words, has any court extended Teddy’s Frosted Foods to a failure to hire?
• Is there a cause of action here for failure to hire?
• Does anyone have discovery requests related to a BFOQ defense?
• Prevailing Party / Federal Court Amended Complaint
• Has anyone used the hate crime statute § 52-571c in a discrimination suit? It allows for treble damages. This seems like it should be brought in every race, disability, gender and sexual orientation case. What do you think?